My Investigation of 9/11
The US government conducted and reported on an investigation into the 9/11 terrorist attacks with the help of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The findings are presented in short form here: FAQs – NIST WTC Towers Investigation. It states that the planes’ impact, fire, and the heavy load of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon.
The US government conducted an investigation and report on the 9/11 terrorist attacks with the help of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The findings are summarized here: FAQs – NIST WTC Towers Investigation. The report concluded that aircraft strikes, fire, and the weight of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon. The US government accused Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden of being responsible for 9/11, although it did not provide any evidence to support this. They tried to capture Osama Bin Laden, but he was killed in the process, leaving many important questions unanswered. The investigation failed to provide a convincing answer to the fundamental question of why these 19 Muslims did it.
Together, these gaps opened the door to conspiracy theories. Many people disagree with the NIST report. They accuse the US government of destroying the WTC by planting explosive devices in it and crashing a missile into a part of the Pentagon.
One of the leading organizations that accuse the government is “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.” These organizations mainly present their accusations on social networks such as Facebook and YouTube. Their reports dominate the topic, with thousands of documentaries trying to prove the government did it. These reports are pseudoscientific, so I have to disagree with them.
If we analyze motives for the terrorist attack, the government and mainstream US media have found it in the fact that the suicidal terrorists did not like US values, freedom and democracy. Those are really shallow and miserable statements with which I strongly disagree. If they were even slightly objective, they would find motive in the aggressive US foreign policy.
The alternative media has found motive for the alleged government’s involvement in the demolition of the WTC in the desire to get the American people to support the conquest of independent countries in the Middle East. The wars in the Middle East were indeed triggered by 9/11. However, I do not see how US government officials would be able to gain personally from the crime of aggression against these independent countries.
While reading discussions related to 9/11 on various forums, I found the most significant divide was between people who think the government did it and those who do not believe it. I would say approximately half accuse the government of 9/11, and half don’t. They fiercely argue about why 9/11 happened, who had an interest in it, and finally, who did it. They were not able to find convincing answers and an explanation that everyone might agree on. It triggered me to see the truth about 9/11. I conducted my investigation, which provided conclusive answers to all the questions regarding 9/11. I am presenting my findings here.
The Twin Towers. We all saw two planes hit the Twin Towers. The planes’ impacts critically damaged them. If the aircraft had been twice as large, they probably would have cut the towers in two. Then the fire weakened the buildings' structure until the enormous loads reached critical pressure, causing the towers to collapse. That was the government’s explanation, with which I agree. I wrote the article A Clear Explanation Why the Twin Towers Collapsed, in which I have scientifically explained how the skyscrapers collapsed. I believe it is a credible explanation.
Alternative media on social networks have accused the US government of planting explosives which destroyed the Twin Towers. Thousands of reports and documentaries tried to convince people by using suggestive explanations, such as that the buildings could never collapse if hit by a plane, or that many witnesses heard the explosions which destroyed the buildings. Some mainstream media outlets broadcast or published the alternative accusations.
I would like to know why none of these reports asked essential questions, such as why anyone would attempt to destroy both twin towers twice simultaneously when such attempts are extremely difficult to execute. Where exactly would the explosive devices be planted to demolish the buildings the way they went down? Who might plant the explosives? How would planting the explosives possibly go unnoticed by people who work there? Explosive experts would have to plant the explosives exactly at the place where the planes hit the buildings, or else the collapse might start elsewhere. That means they would have to know in advance where the jets would hit the buildings. This is hard to believe, even if the pilots were highly skilled. But then, if the planes hit the building exactly where the explosives were planted, why did they not go off immediately when the planes hit? What exactly might have triggered the presumed explosives, and how? What would determine the timing of the explosion? None of that was questioned, analyzed, explained, or discussed, let alone investigated, which is far too weak a serious accusation against the government.
Here I enclosed one of many very shallow documentaries which try to prove that explosive devices demolished the Twin Towers:
The slow-motion video at 38:23 is a well-documented cheat, easy to debunk. The narrator states that the top of the building disappears in the explosion. But no explosion is visible, and no high-speed debris flies from the alleged blast site. Instead, the documentary presents the implosion of the top of the building and the collapsing floors.
You can see eruptions of smoke and fire coming from the building, not from explosions, but from the pressure of collapsing floors. Some people believed they heard explosions in the building. They were mistaken. If we throw a book on a table, it will land with a bang. Imagine how loud the collapse of the whole floor would be! That was what those people heard.
The upper part of the building began imploding floor by floor at the level where the plane hit. The construction below was rigid and resisted the collapse of nearly 10 stories (see the scale in the linked video above). However, it eventually piled on until it reached a critical load and kinetic energy it could not withstand. Then the building's weight hammered down floor by floor, crushing the structure into the foundations, almost like a free fall. Yes, the construction was sturdy, but not enough to resist the power of the falling load above. The columns below bent and collapsed as if a big hammer had hit nails on a hard surface. That is all one needs to understand physics.
And finally, the first building to collapse was hit second by the plane. Why? The second building was hit lower than the first, so the load above the plane’s impact on the second building was greater than the load above the first. The greater pressure hastened the second building's collapse. That also indicates that the explosion did not trigger the collapses.
This video proves that all talk of explosive use is a fraud created by false conspiracy creators. It proves the documentary was created on purpose to accuse the government and trick people.
The Pentagon. No camera clearly shows the Pentagon being hit by a plane. The security cameras around the Pentagon captured one snapshot per second, while the plane flew at 150 meters per second, allowing it to escape the camera. That opened the door to conspiracy theorists claiming that not a plane hit the Pentagon but a missile. Again, thousands of alternative media have created fake pseudoscientific reports claiming a missile caused the Pentagon's destruction. So, according to these reports, a missile hit the Pentagon.
These reports did not bother to question where the missing plane was if a missile hit the Pentagon. The attack on the Pentagon occurred at 9:45 AM. Hundreds of people saw the plane hitting the Pentagon, and not one person saw a missile. That's why these reports didn't bother to ask eyewitnesses what they saw. Even the conspiracy theory stands on extremely shaky legs; no seriously organized effort has been made to debunk these reports.
These fake reports cannot fool people who think for themselves and try to discover the truth. Some individuals fought to prove their point but got lost in a sea of fake reports. For example, Jeffrey Hill, frustrated by false statements about the destruction of the Pentagon, conducted his own research nine years after the incident. He searched the archives of various newspapers, trying to find the eyewitness statements. He found many witnesses and interviewed them through unsolicited phone calls, asking them to confirm what they saw on 9/11. After that, Jeffrey Hill said: “These people did not talk about hypotheticals based on the size of the hole in the Pentagon or the lack of aircraft debris; they related what they saw on 9/11.” Jeffrey Hill presented the voice recordings and his analysis here: What really happened. ”His conclusion was: “The Pentagon was hit by a plane, end of story.” He proved it.
The Pentagon actually collapsed the same way as the Twin Towers, even though the load above the impact point was much smaller. The longer fire replaced the lesser destructive power of the Pentagon’s weight.
The WTC Building 7. It is central to the conspiracy theory because its supporters claim that such a building never collapsed due to fire. To them, it looked like a controlled demolition — repeated thousands of times in thousands of reports. In such a way, the collapse of WTC Building 7 has become perceived as a controlled demolition by a large number of people.
However, everything that these reports present is wrong. Actual future events proved that high-rise buildings do collapse in a fire. On May 13, 2008, the 13-story Faculty of Architecture tower at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands collapsed in a fire. On 19 January 2017, the 17-story Plasco Building in Tehran, Iran, collapsed during a skyscraper fire.
Also, one could not possibly secretly plant explosive devices in either WTC building. First, planting explosives capable of destroying the building would take a lot of time and could not go undetected by the people who worked there. Second, such explosives cannot be invisible.
The collapse of WTC Building 7 really looked like a controlled demolition as it was presented in the media, but that does not mean it was indeed a controlled demolition. All these “deep analytic and scientific” documentaries about the collapse of Building 7 have “forgotten” to present that its core collapsed 7 seconds before the rest of the building. They skipped that on purpose because it would prove that no explosive was used in the building’s collapse. Please take a look at the following documentary at 7:24:
No controlled demolition of any building ever happened in two parts with a 7-second delay. No camera detected an explosion in Building 7, and no one saw one, even though the building was under constant supervision before the collapse.
So what happened? Debris from the North WTC twin tower damaged Building 7 (see the picture below). It burned almost all day after being abandoned by firefighters, which was normal after the ruin of the Twin Towers. When firefighters abandoned the burning building, its collapse was just a matter of time. The all-day fire also weakened the building's already damaged steel structure. The building's heavy load destroyed the weakest core columns, leading to its collapse.
But why did the whole building collapse? The fire did not affect the entire building. I am an architect and engineer, and I will try to explain it here in a way everyone can understand. The collapse of the building’s core, along with the broken corner, disrupted the building’s static balance and caused horizontal pressure. As a result, the whole building twisted one second before the collapse, as shown in the documentary. The controlled demolition cannot cause this twist because controlled demolitions always collapse buildings straight down. These buildings drop; they do not twist. This twist destroyed the building.
Steel construction resists axial pressure well but is very weak in bending. Steel columns are too thin to withstand large bending forces, especially if exposed to high temperatures. They act like wooden sticks. One can easily break a stick by bending it until it snaps, and that is the only way to break it. The same happens to steel columns. When Building 7 twisted, the building’s load created an enormous bending moment in the steel columns. They bent with little resistance and, in no time, were on the floor, most of them damaged by fire. Then the building collapsed almost in free fall, as we saw. Building 7 started falling in the core slightly ahead of the perimeter. That delay presents the horizontal speed of the collapsing columns under the load.
The only convincing claim from conspiracy theorists is that Building 7's collapse looked like a controlled demolition; however, steel-frame buildings could not collapse any other way. This is the only way Building 7 could have collapsed.
The US government could not destroy the WTC even in theory. President Bush acted awkwardly when he was informed about 9/11, which tells me he knew nothing about it. He couldn't have hidden it if he knew. Also, I cannot even imagine how the government would find one person in the darkest corner of the CIA willing to kill thousands of fellow citizens. Planting explosives in the WTC would require the engagement of a large number of people. Also, there is no guarantee they would all keep silent. That would be an entirely impossible mission. I’ve found that all of the accusations against the government are incredibly shallow nonsense, leading me to conclude that we are witnessing a conspiracy against the government, innocent of the destruction of 9/11.
I hope this analysis has shown everyone that a conspiracy against the government exists. OK, but who are then the conspirators, and why did they accuse the government? Did the conspiracy against the US government have anything to do with the suicidal terrorists who attacked the WTC? I think it did, and I will try to explain it here.
Only an extremely powerful organization must have organized a conspiracy against the US government. Only the most influential capital could manage it. The conspirators are the powerful owners of large corporations that rule over the Western world. This capital has an interest in dominating the whole world. They wanted to extend their power over the Middle East by using the 9/11 conspiracy. I’ll try to prove it here.
Big capital needed 9/11 to get support from the American people for aggression against the independent Middle Eastern countries and their conquest. All wars that took place in the Middle East after 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy. The US government could not profit from these aggressions; only corporate owners could benefit. They profit from wars.
Could the 9/11 attack have been organized by the attackers alone? Was it a gift from heaven to the owners of corporations that enabled them to attack the Middle East? This is hardly possible. In that case, the mass-organized accusations against the US government would not exist. The conspirators would have had to wait for an opportunity to conquer Middle Eastern countries, and that wasn't in their best interest. I believe that big capital accelerated this process by planning the attack on the WTC. The conspiracy was born.
The conspirators could have relatively easily found people ready to destroy the WTC in Saudi Arabia, where most suicidal terrorists come from. One agent of the conspirators might have contacted one person in Saudi Arabia to find people willing to commit 9/11. It should not have been a difficult task in a state full of religious fanatics, very angry at the US for its aggressive foreign policy. In that case, the perpetrators faced almost no risk of being caught. I believe the conspirators did it that way. Those suicidal fanatics most likely received money and support to destroy the WTC. Otherwise, they would have difficulty entering the US or attending flight school, for example. But the most rewarding thing for suicidal terrorists was pride in being chosen for such a big task. Ironically, they committed 9/11 without knowing they worked for their worst enemies. Some information points to Saudi Arabia having something to do with 9/11, but there is strong resistance to any investigation.
The owners of corporations knew they had committed a massive crime by destroying the WTC. To hide possible traces of the crime, they needed to frame somebody else. The US government was the perfect suspect. Big Capital accused the US government of 9/11, mainly through alternative media. Massive attacks on the US government point to a large organization that supports this conspiracy. Big Capital did it to prevent the development of an idea that might connect them to the crime. In other words, if big capital were not involved in 9/11, there would be no reason for its accusations against the government. In this case, articles which accuse the government of 9/11 would hardly exist, and nobody would take them seriously. That fact indirectly proves big capital committed 9/11. If the government did help big capital in the 9/11 conspiracy in any way, big capital would accuse another innocent victim. Well, they certainly would not blame themselves!
The government is a puppet on the strings of big capital, and big capital doesn't mind accusing the government if it benefits them. Corporate owners often do this because it makes people feel powerless and more likely to accept it. Whenever people hear that the CIA did this or that, there is no way they would ever know if the rich did not tell them. Simply, the rich control all the information people receive. It does not matter whether the CIA did this or that; accusing the CIA means accusing the government. The accusations have never gone to the rich who control the government and profit from it.
Does it mean big capital plans to sacrifice the government? Of course not! It cannot do it with such shallow accusations, and also because the government is innocent of 9/11. If, under the pressure of allegations against the government, which are paradoxically controlled by the same big capital, the investigation into 9/11 ever reopens, it would, in no time, find that explosives were never used and that the government is innocent.
Then, big capital would release thousands of objective reports about 9/11 in all of the media, which right now prevents them from being published, presenting a full shallowness of today’s fake reports. The truth would “win”. That would tell everyone that no conspiracy ever existed, which would be false. No investigation would ever be performed in Saudi Arabia where the suicides were engaged, and big capital would walk free, as it is used to doing after committing crimes. This is just another deception big capital has mastered.
Some people who accuse the government right now would not accept the truth, as Mark Twain said: “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Another part of those people would feel stupid and would be ashamed of being seduced. They would become silent members of society, with no desire to rebel again. I have already seen this while presenting the truth on various forums. Both of these people are useful to big capital.
Now people need to understand that the conspiracy of 9/11 triggered wars worth trillions of dollars. Not to mention how much the conspiracy would be worth to big capital if they succeed in conquering all the countries in the Middle East.
Can you imagine how many conspiracy agents the conspirators could hire with that much money? They wouldn't have had trouble finding people who would support their conspiracy theory and say whatever the conspirators needed. The public is already programmed not to understand anything because the media continually presents nonsense. People are so confused that they no longer know what is true and what is false. I want to emphasize that the primary task of a conspiracy is to profit the conspirators, but it also requires concealing this by leading people astray. Cheating people is the center of any conspiracy.
Among thousands of propagandists who accuse the government of 9/11, I believe hundreds are paid for their job. The rest are so naive followers that they help the conspirators for free. These people still don't drop the case, even 16 years after the event.
One of the most exposed conspiracy supporters is Richard Gage, a member of the “American Institute of Architects” and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I can guess how he became influential. Probably, he expressed his opinion somewhere publicly that the government might be responsible for 9/11. After that, he immediately gained strong access to the media and substantial funds to spread his views more widely. That attracted naive people, helping the conspiracy movement take shape.
Dr. Juddy Wood wrote, “The Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in mid-air.” She called the technology that destroyed the Twin Towers a directed-energy weapon, but failed to say anything about it. Readers can easily conclude that only the US government could develop such a weapon. But the dust formed because more than 5,000 cubic meters of extra-light concrete were embedded in the building floors as a sound barrier and to prevent vibration in the steel structure. The additional light concrete instantly turned to dust under the heavy pressure of the collapse. Dr. Juddy Wood's brief observation gained significant media and scientific attention. The truth has many more obstacles to break through.
The conspirators control the media and let corrupt and stupid people speak publicly. Many architects and engineers do not want to speak out against such shallow accusations against the government. Some of them could easily debunk the 9/11 conspiracy, but do not have access to the media. That is how those in power control society’s opinions.
Richard Gage allegedly leads a group of over 2,500 architects and engineers who support the idea that the government committed 9/11. Here is one of Richard Gage’s propaganda works:
“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth” calls for an investigation which is supposed to uncover who is responsible for 9/11, but I believe they do not know that they work for these people. “The 9/11 Truth” is a non-profit organization which cannot survive without donors. If they disclose the names of those people who are giving them money, that might lead to those people who actually organized 9/11. The investigation needs to follow the money.
The money would most likely lead to Jacob Rothschild unless it stops at David Rockefeller, who recently died. Anyway, they have worked together on the top-secret conspiracy. Jacob Rothschild is a hidden leader of the Western world. He is the owner of corporations and a big capital from this article. I don't have hard evidence against him because it is impossible to collect without an official investigation. My accusation is based on the fact that no one else is powerful enough to do 9/11. I have been investigating Jacob Rothschild since NATO attacked my homeland, Yugoslavia, and published the findings in the article: Jacob Rothschild is guilty of the conspiracy against humankind.
November 5, 2017
References: