Cancer and Conspiracy
I wrote this article after my cousin Viktor Jakovljev died from cancer. I researched cancer and shared what I found here. I hope it contributes to a solution that could one day win the battle against cancer.
***
Cancer is the leading cause of death in the USA, immediately after heart disease. The accepted methods of treatment- chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are very aggressive to humans. Chemotherapy uses poisons such as mustard gas to kill cancer cells. Cancer cells are weaker than healthy cells in the human body, and when exposed to poisons, they die before healthy cells. Of course, healthy cells die in the process, as does the human defence system against diseases. Radiation works on a similar principle, and surgery removes cancerous tissue.
According to statistics of the American Cancer Society, 60% of patients survive cancer. These statistics may be exaggerated because more favourable statistics regarding the fight against cancer suit the association better. It should be noted that according to the same statistics, people who survive cancer 5 years after detection are considered cured. If the cancer returns after this period, it is a new case. This suggests that cancer survival is realistically below 60%.
Furthermore, under the influence of cancer-fighting drugs, people sometimes experience fatal heart attacks. If these or similar deaths are not attributed to cancer, which is possible because it is a grey area, then the real survival rate is significantly below 60%. People younger than 45 years present 3% of the total number of deaths, while 70% of fatalities come from those aged 65 and over. The older bodies are weaker and endure aggressive treatment more harshly.
The American Cancer Society predicts that every other person in the present population will get cancer, while one in four will die from it, and one in three women will get cancer, and one in five will die.
This information should alert the American government to allocate resources to the fight against cancer, but it does not. I guess the American government is convinced that enough has been done in the battle against cancer. In the last 40 years, the United States has spent over 200 billion dollars trying to cure cancer, but a cure has not been found. Apathy seems to have taken over, leading to the belief that nothing more can be done. The truth is that the whole fight against cancer is under the control of big business, whose insufficiently successful treatment methods earn massive profits, and that is more important to them than the lives of people.
There are many theories of cancer origins, as well as alternative methods of prevention and treatment of cancer, for which nothing is invested.
Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883 – 1970), one of the leading cell biologists of the twentieth century, claims in his book “The Metabolism of Tumours” that the primary cause of cancer is a lack of oxygen in the cells. Normal cells cannot survive without oxygen, whereas cancerous cells can. According to him, cancer primarily results from the replacement of oxygen in normal body cells with a fermentation of sugar. Cancer is no more than a defence mechanism that some cells use to survive without oxygen. The support of this hypothesis lies in the fact that the heart is the only organ that can hardly have cancer because the lack of oxygen in the heart causes a heart attack and death.
Dr. Warburg showed that the lack of oxygen creates acidic cells. Tumorous cells are highly acidic. A healthy pH level (potential of hydrogen) in a cell is 7. Values below that are acidic, which is unhealthy. A lower pH signifies lower concentrations of oxygen molecules, which destroy healthy cells and support cancer growth. Values above 7 are alkaline, with higher oxygen levels that favour healthy cell growth and hinder cancer growth. According to Dr. Warburg, tumorous cells cannot survive in the presence of high concentrations of oxygen.
Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg received a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1931. He was also the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cell Physiology in Berlin. Surprisingly, the work of such a high authority has not been supported for over 80 years. To be clear, it is not easy to deliver oxygen to the body because the kidneys discard excess acidity and alkalinity. However, there is no justification for the lack of research on increasing the body’s alkalinity, which, according to Dr. Warburg, will eradicate cancer.
Dr. Theodore A. Baroody, in his book Alkalize or Die, from 2002, wrote: “Any stressor that the mind or body interprets and internalizes as too much to deal with leaves an acid residue. Even a mild stressor can cause a partial or total acid-forming reaction.” And continued: “The countless names attached to illness do not really matter. What does matter is that they all come from the same root cause: too much tissue acid waste in the body.”
This introductory presentation suggests that cancer is the result of an unhealthy lifestyle. An unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and stress reduce the supply of oxygen to the cells and thus favour the occurrence of cancer. So we can prevent cancer by eating healthy and being physically active. Exercise increases breathing, providing more oxygen to cells and strengthening the body.
Food creates acidity or alkalinity in the body, depending on what one eats. Unhealthy eating habits that produce acidity and should be avoided include meat, milk, sugar, refined flour, salt, and all their products. One should increase the consumption of healthy alkaline foods such as raw fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and honey. In this regard, a diet rich in alkaline foods can suppress or reduce cancer. Elderly and sick people should eat mostly these foods.
Dr.George W.Crile (1864-1943), one of the most excellent American surgeons, claimed: “There is no such thing as a natural death. All deaths from so-called natural causes are merely the endpoint of progressive acid saturation. Any form of poor health indicates a disturbed state of body chemistry balance – generally an acid state. In fact, over-acidity is common to all health-robbing conditions. An infant is highly alkaline. An 80-year-old person is highly acidic. Death is 100% acidity.” Also, he stated: “It is entirely impossible that cancer appears in a person who avoids foods that produce acidity and who rids the body of the acidity with a healthy alkaline diet. In general, cancer is not contracted nor is it inherited. What you inherit is eating habits, environment, and lifestyle. This can result in cancer.”
People have always known what healthy food and a healthy life are. A government concerned about the lives of its people should inform the public about the differences between healthy and unhealthy lifestyles. One cannot say that the governments in the Western world do not try to suppress cancer. The Canadian government, for example, recommends a healthy diet, as well as sport and recreation. It calls for free clinical examinations for early cancer detection. It provides free healthcare to all Canadian citizens. (However, I cannot help feeling that, by paying the bills for all citizens, the government primarily supports the Canadian medical industry.) It banned smoking in public places and introduced high taxes on cigarettes. Nevertheless, governments need to promote healthy lifestyles much more.
Western governments should stimulate the production of healthy food by imposing taxes on unhealthy foods and prohibiting harmful ingredients in food. Today, the food industry primarily processes foods with acidic characteristics, then, for inexplicable reasons, removes their nutrients and adds unhealthy substances. For example, from wheat they remove proteins, fats, and minerals, so only acid starch remains in the end. Then they bleach it using chlorine, which destroys nutrients in the human body. Such food is consumed far more regularly than cigarettes, and therefore, it most likely presents a more significant source of cancer than smoking. But taxing junk food would reduce the profits of the food industry, one of the most profitable industries for big business. They will surely oppose it. Big companies sponsor election campaigns in Western governments, and they will not act against their interests. They will not tax junk food.
Big businesses lobby parliaments in Western countries to allow the use of antibiotics, pesticides, preservatives, and toxins in food production to increase profits. They have established the Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international body that sets standards for food production worldwide. In this way, they plan to impose unhealthy food ingredients on all of humanity. This will make people ill worldwide. Furthermore, sick people are profitable to the pharmaceutical and medical industries. These industries really have no interest in healing people because healthy people do not need their products and services. The production of food, drugs, and medicine complements each other to create profits rather than improve people’s health. We live in a very unhealthy and immoral society, physically and spiritually.
Big businesses support only those methods for treating cancer which bring profits to them and reject methods that do not make money. The average initial cancer treatment through adopted methods costs around $50,000. Big profits certainly discourage the medical industry from finding a cure for cancer, and it is indeed not interested in finding an inexpensive one.
Dr. Tullio Simoncini, an Italian doctor and oncologist born in 1951, practiced the use of baking powder in the fight against cancer. Baking powder, or sodium bicarbonate, has a pH of 10 and, according to Dr. Warburg, is well suited to treating cancer. Dr. Simoncini claims that cancer is caused by the fungus Candida albicans, as explained in his book, “Cancer Is A Fungus.” Baking powder is indeed the best-known antifungal drug, and traditional medicine recognizes it as a cure for many health problems. Besides, baking powder is very inexpensive and, when used properly, is not harmful to people's health in any way.
Dr. Simoncini’s teachings have attracted a lot of people suffering from cancer worldwide in the last 20 years. There are numerous testimonies that Dr. Simoncini cured their cancer. Many of them were cured by modern medicine. Unfortunately, one patient died after his treatment. I do not know if Dr. Simoncini made a mistake in the therapy, but he lost his medical licence in court and was sentenced to a prison term of three years. This was because his treatment method was not permitted by the Italian authorities. In the United States, 600,000 people die each year from cancer, and of course, no doctors lost their license nor were they sentenced to jail because they used the legalized methods of treatment.
Cancer treatment regulation worldwide is mainly based on U.S. policy, since the United States is recognized as a leader in modern medicine. In America, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Chemical Society (ACS), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and others regulate procedures. Big businesses have used their economic power to develop control over these institutions and systematically suppress or ban all natural ways of treating cancer. Modern medicine considers natural healing unverifiable and prohibits doctors from using natural medication even though there is plenty of evidence on the effectiveness of treatment.
Science completely withdraws from Dr. Simoncini. First, science is very conservative, and second, big capital has directed it for centuries. Science cannot develop without money, and big businesses only support science that benefits them. They ignore science they deem useless and corrupt or sabotage science that runs counter to their interests. Thus, scientific books are saturated with a large amount of incorrect or insufficiently correct knowledge. A scientist who adopts inaccurate or incomplete knowledge would hardly accept their mistakes even when they become aware of them.
Medical doctors criticize Dr. Simoncini’s work, arguing that it is not supported by science and clinical practice and that it contradicts widely accepted facts in oncology and microbiology. Scientific circles also claim that Simoncini’s work lacks scientific evidence from credible experiments and clinical trials. How can he prove his claims with scientific evidence and clinical trials when his treatment method is not permitted, as clinics are forbidden from using his healing process? Thus, medical science prevents people from healing.
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, an American nutritionist, has treated cancer patients for more than 30 years by using only natural, healthy food. He argues that the results of his treatment of pancreatic cancer are better than the results achieved by chemotherapy. He has no problem with the authorities because no one can charge him for treating people with healthy food, but he does not have support from the American Institutes, without which one cannot effectively fight cancer.
Dr. Gonzalez accuses conventional medicine of not supporting natural healing methods but trying to undermine them. In his book “What Went Wrong,” he describes his struggle to gain recognition for his treatments from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the National Cancer Institute. He failed because biased scientists have sabotaged his work. They entirely disavowed the positive results of his work. Alternative cancer treatments cannot get support.
The adoption of natural methods for cancer treatment and the implementation of clinical research must not be hindered, especially because these therapies have no side effects. This does not necessarily need to eliminate chemotherapy and radiation as accepted methods of combating cancer. Clinical trials using new treatment methods can determine whether the results of such an anti-cancer treatment are better. I believe it can be. As a philosopher, I have concluded that truths in nature are very simple, but we need to see them. Therefore, I believe that the cure for cancer is somewhere among us, and we just need to pick it up.
I believe that a cure for cancer would have been discovered, or at least good prevention, if big capital had not prevented an effective fight against cancer. Big businesses are secretly united within a single entity and lobby their interests across governments, institutes, universities, and the media of the Western world, thereby revealing the power that rules the Western world. If there were two centers of power, they would fight each other for supremacy, and we would see it. You saw how uncooperative Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi ended up. An incredible conspiracy drives big business. I wrote about it in the article: “Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind.”
Through analyzing the failure of the fight against cancer, I cannot help but feel that big businesses use cancer to reduce the overpopulation of the planet. Cancer is beneficial to big capital because it rids marginalized people, those who do not have enough money for a healthy life, and especially the non-productive elderly. This results from the ideology of capitalism, which holds that profit is the highest value. The insufficient interest of state governments, academic institutions and the media in solving the problem of cancer suggests that they are all controlled by the same center and are implicitly involved in the crime of murdering people. Conspiracy has affected every pore of today’s society, and I do not see the possibility of a successful contest for the welfare of humankind if we do not face the source of the conspiracy. This is Jacob Rothschild.
October 12, 2014